BBK 2015 Mustang GT V6 6-Pin Front O2 Sensor Wire Harness Extensions 12 (pair) And Bolt Kit

BBK 2015 Mustang GT V6 6-Pin Front O2 Sensor Wire Harness Extensions 12 (pair) And Bolt Kit

Marsoni

M251S

$89.99

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

BBK 2015 Mustang GT V6 6-Pin Front O2 Sensor Wire Harness Extensions 12 (pair) And Bolt KitWhen you install a set of BBK Performance long tube exhaust headers 1633 or 16330 on your 2015 17 Mustang GT 5. 0 the O2 sensors are relocated on the header that is no longer in the factory location and the factory O2 sensor connectors will not reach to connect any longer.. These extension harnesses and bolt kit is required when Installing BBK 1633 16330 or 1856 18560 Headers on a 2015 2017 Mustang 5. 0 All harnesses feature OEM Factory connectors to

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your BBK 2015 Mustang GT V6 6-Pin Front O2 Sensor Wire Harness Extensions 12 (pair) And Bolt Kit orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your BBK 2015 Mustang GT V6 6-Pin Front O2 Sensor Wire Harness Extensions 12 (pair) And Bolt Kit ships.

Need Help?
Questions about BBK 2015 Mustang GT V6 6-Pin Front O2 Sensor Wire Harness Extensions 12 (pair) And Bolt Kit, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for BBK 2015 Mustang GT V6 6-Pin Front O2 Sensor Wire Harness Extensions 12 (pair) And Bolt Kit in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

My 2005 Jetta failed the inspection and my mechanic said (after clearing the engine light) that I should drive the car for 20 min highway and 20 local. We've tried that the whole day but out of three lights on his device only 1 went away. Next day the light engine came back. After not being happy with the explanation offered by him (a family friend) that I should keep driving it until we get lucky I went online and found CRC 05063. Followed the instruction (one bottle on full tank of gas). Before my tank was under 3/4, engine light went off!! At half tank I went and did the inspection - IT PASSED! I am really impressed! Update August 2015! I have been using this product for 2-3 years now and if it is not working for you please read. In July I have used the first bottle and took my 2005 Jetta for inspection. It failed. Ordered a second bottle and it failed again. My mechanic said keep driving. Did 200 miles in one day and nothing. Decided to take matters in my own hands and ordered Autel MaxiScan MS300 ($18, it allows you to read and delete codes). There were two faults - EVAP and 2nd something about Oxygen. Went online and this is the first time I heard about driving cycles. These are steps that you have to follow so that your car's computer can start measuring all the parameters needed for the test. Driving cycles are not exact science but I tried to follow the instructions as much as I could and after just 20 minutes (10min city and 10min highway) ALL the parameters were set and I passed the emission test with flying colors! So, just before you give a comment about CRC like "tried and didn't work" be aware that there are other things you have to take into account.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on July 1, 2013

Verified Purchase

Colleen Milakovich

Pawtucket, US

★★★★★ 3

My car did not pass!

Size: 1 Count (Pack of 1)

My car didn't pass. However, the company CRC sent me a reimbursement check.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 21, 2026

Verified Purchase

RON HAGGIN

Charlottesville, US

★★★★★ 5

Pass Again

Size: 1 Count (Pack of 1)

This product never fails (no pun intended), I have been using this for the last 10 years my car has never failed a smog test. I highly recommend this and that you use it correctly. You will not be disappointed.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 27, 2026

Verified Purchase

NightOwl007

Omaha, US

★★★★★ 5

Really Helps-Especially for Star Station Tests-Haven’t Failed Since Using in Two Older Vehicles

Size: 1 Count (Pack of 1)

Ever since the new CA State mandate that older cars and trucks have to go to a Star Emissions Station for their smog check I have become very familiar with Guaranteed to Pass. The first year of getting smogged under the new regulations my 1995 truck barely failed. It’s a tougher series of tests and it really sucks to have to pay more for a smog test that is designed to get older cars and trucks off the road that would normally pass a regular smog check. It came at a bad time, having just been laid off and losing my health insurance and income and trying to figure how to come up with money for truck repairs to get my registration renewed so I could be a viable job candidate in the really bad job market of a few years back (and still today, may I add.) But that is a whole other issue that gets my blood boiling. So back to my experience with Guaranteed to Pass. My 1995 Ford Truck barely failed and I mean barely according to the emission numbers so I had the manifold cleaned out, used premium gas for a tank and added Guaranteed to Pass. Having two gas tanks was handy as I could switch the tank to a fresh tank without the remainder of the additive in it for the retest. It passed with flying colors. So for our other older 1993 mini-van and the truck in the few successive years since I always run the premium gas with Guaranteed to Pass in the tanks before the smog check. We’ve had the van and truck tested 3-4 times combined since and they pass every time. So I’m sold on Guaranteed to Pass and will vouch for it.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 14, 2016